The h4831sc load data Diaries
The h4831sc load data Diaries
Blog Article
Given that there doesn't look like any "Formal" Load Data around for this Load, can some of you deliver a starting point with this mix and factors to consider when Doing work this Load up?
They've executed identically for me. Like Absolutely everyone else I rushed to obtain the more recent SC Edition but have now switched again. Ideally you would like about a hundred% loading density. Should you have adequate case ability with the H4831(prolonged) you might be most likely better off.
The point that the H4831 is certainly a slower burning powder is exactly why you are looking at higher velocities acquired with that powder, versus Everything you've viewed Using the IMR stuff. Also good powder, but fairly superior suited to slightly smaller sized situations which has a little bit a lot less potential.
Sweet!! I am going to choose some up and provides it a test. Thank you men, I recognize it! I am going to Allow you to know very well what I uncover. I do have about a half pound of 4350 I'm able to check out that first and find out what takes place.
My experience would be that the SC and SSC loaded to exactly the same pounds because the extensive cut reveals a reduced velocity.
I realize, rough instances. H4831SC will definitely work, I just failed to like the case density when loaded lengthy. I do not recall powder cost off the top of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps and that is the place I typically aim being. With your situation employing what you might have (and what I should have performed) I'd begin with the top on the bearing area on the bullet ideal with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you discover a velocity node.
Nampa, Idaho In my encounter the only real true big difference would be that the shortcut meters greater by means of reloading equipment. The moment It really is loaded theres no functional variation. I've listened to that the shortcut may have a little bit more rapidly burn amount but it seems insignificant.
Im beneath the knowledge I choose to use h4831sc. I have browse that these powders are equivalent Aside from the shorter grain measurement on the sc. Ought to I nonetheless be on the lookout for h4381sc?
At present making use of IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a popular choice for this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. Besides it currently being limited Lower, what's the difference in both of these powders, and will I switch to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? What precisely is my level? I am undecided that there is a true legitimate point aside from exactly what is well-liked with most has not been preferred with me in any respect in these situation. Do I just Have got a powder jinx or one thing? Only to provide you with how mad I actually am, tomorrow I'm vary testing a buddies new .
Operate your load up with the particular powder (sc or standard) and whole lot you will be working h4831 vs h4831sc with nevertheless. Similar burn off amount doesn't suggest it is going to behave "just" precisely the same. I've noticed more than a hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.
It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Identified a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot group now. It can be just a little slower than H1000, but shoots good. Thanks for the recommendation, It really is good to are aware that I've obtained choices when just one or the other powder is dried up.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but had far better pace and accuracy with H1000. I h4831 vs h4831sc would alternatively utilize a slower burning powder with 215g tablets.
Needless to say, sitting all over for twenty+ decades (I know a guy who is still using the H4831 he bought inside the 60s), signifies that burn off premiums will most h4831sc load data likely transform a smidge, and new manufacture things will probably be a little distinctive too.